<<< Previous Section | Next section >>> |
1. Apocalyptic
Times
By
the Roman times, the followers of Judahism must have had a number of questions
that the Old Testament – the Bible to them – could not answer. After all, Judahists had now had
hundreds of years to contemplate their relationship to Yahweh. The results of their musings must necessarily have been
confusing. For instance:
a) Was
Yahweh omnipotent? Were the Gods of other peoples real?
b) If
Yahweh was the ultimate God, why wasn’t Judah/Israel a free, independent
nation? (The territory had been
conquered by a series of empires, including Assyria, Persia, Greece, Rome.)
c) Didn’t
Yahweh make a deal with the people to provide them with land? Did Yahweh break the deal, or did his
people break the deal? Or was the
deal still intact?
d) Was
the covenant with an entire people, or was it with each individual amongst the
people?
e) What
was there to look forward to in the future?
Would the religion fade away? What
did the future hold for the Chosen People?
f)
Why did Yahweh require ritual sacrifice at the altar of the Temple?
g) Whose
priests knew the correct rules of the religion: Israel or Judah?
There
were so many questions, and suddenly there was a wide array of answers. Perhaps the Messiah – prophesized by
the Old Testament in a roundabout manner – was coming. Perhaps the understanding of the
religion needed modification. Maybe
they all had it wrong?
Figure 8.1: Calendar of
dates:
Desecration of
Second Temple |
167 BCE |
Maccabean Revolt |
167 |
Judah independent |
163 |
Book of Daniel
completed |
160 |
Septuagint
completed |
160 |
Pompey controls
Judah for Rome |
63 |
Herod the Great
conquers Judah for Rome |
37 |
Herod the Great
dies |
4 |
Jesus born |
4 |
2. The
New Testament
The
New Testament was a left turn for a sleepy religion with a substantial, but
still fairly limited, following.
During
the 600 years the Torah had existed, Judahism had not grown exponentially. True, it had grown, but several factors
inhibited its growth. First,
Judahism was the religion of Judah, a very small patch of land. It had not been exported to other
regions because Judah was not an independent and expanding nation. It was currently a Roman territory, and
Rome had its own state religion. Second,
by the traditions of the Old Testament, the religion frowned upon intermarriage,
especially marriages in which the wife was not a Judahist (Ezra ??). Thus it didn’t expand as a result of
territorial conquest or intermarriage, and population growth in the region was
not significant. There were a few
pockets of Judahists outside of Judah, but these were not so large as to account
for much growth. However, the
religion otherwise had several important things going for it. There was an established scripture, which had survived for a
millennium. It postulated one
God, which had made a covenant with mankind.
This message was a powerful platform from which to expand, as we shall
see.
The
New Testament centers around the stories of Jesus, and the role of his followers
in establishing a new religion based on a much older one. Jesus was born “Yeshua” in the
Hebrew, which has been anglicized to Jesus by way of the Greek version of his
name (Iesus). From the Hebrew to
English directly, Yeshua is Joshua. So
Jesus and Joshua are really derived from the same name. We will use the more common name Jesus here.
The
New Testament was written originally in Greek, the most popular second language
of the Mediterranean at the time. However,
Jesus’ native tongue was Aramaic. Jesus was a Judahist, and worshipped Yahweh. He presumably knew Hebrew, as he was
apparently versed in the Old Testament. It
is possible, but not likely, that Jesus spoke Greek; it would have been his
third language. Therefore, we would
conclude that the words attributed to Jesus in the New Testament were
translations from Aramaic to Greek of the things he actually said.
The
New Testament writings used a device common to the Old Testament writers: the
new message made direct reference to older writings as a way to establish their
legitimacy. Much of the message of
the New Testament fits in nicely with Judahist traditions. Again and again, it is made clear that
the God of the New Testament is the God of the Old Testament (although he is no
longer called Yahweh). Initially,
the newer, more expansive role of Judahism as seen by the Jesus sect was in
keeping with contemporary practice, and was probably no more radical than some
of the other Judahist sects.
For
example, the Pharisees were a popular Judahist sect during Jesus’ life. The Pharisees shared many religious
ideas with the Jesus sect, including the idea that a messiah – descended from
the Davidic line – would soon come. They
believed the messiah had been prophesized in the Old Testament book of Daniel,
as well as other writings. The
Jesus sect obviously saw that person in Jesus, while the Pharisees did not. In fact, Jesus’ line of descent from
David is given twice (differently, in Matthew 1 and Luke 3) to drive this point
home.
Ultimately,
the result was a new religion with a new twist: accept (most of) the existing
Old Testament, but extend it with contemporary ideas from a messiah (Jesus) even
holier than Moses himself!
So
this naturally raises the question: is the religion based on the Jesus sect a
form of Judahism? Did later
Christians appropriate the Old Testament for the establishment of a new
religion? True enough, the Old
Testament is fundamental to Christianity. (Later
attempts by some Christians to separate the Old Testament from Christianity
failed.)
It
is not our job here to answer this question.
In fact, it may be more a question of semantics. But it seems that what was a sect during
Jesus’ life did in fact become a distinct religion within a relatively short
time, less than a hundred years. And
yet it shared perhaps 75% of its scripture with another religion, that of
Judahism.
The
New Testament writers use the rules of scriptural authorship brilliantly. Again and again, the arrival of Jesus is
seen as final step in a series of steps tracing back over a thousand years. Wherever possible, reference is made to
Old Testament sources. Wherever
possible, a prophecy is to be read into the Old Testament; then, the prophesized
event occurs in the New Testament. Direct
quotes are even taken from the Old Testament and inserted in the New Testament. This could not easily be accomplished
without the assistance of a learned student of the Old Testament.
The
New Testament consists primarily of the Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke and John)
and the Pauline Letters. Other
important books include Acts and Revelations.
The Gospels tell the story of the life of Jesus. The Pauline letters, along with Acts,
tell the story of the early Christians over a period of about 35 years after the
death of Jesus. Revelations is an
apocalyptic vision of the future. As
with the Old Testament, we do not know who really wrote the different books
(with the exception of many of the Pauline Letters, which were written by Paul).
(Note:
from here on out, we will refer to Judahists as Jews, as the Judahist religion
begins its transformation into Judaism.)
Figure 9.1: Calendar of
dates:
Jesus born |
4 BCE |
Jesus crucified |
33 CE |
Paul’s ministry |
48 |
Temple destroyed by
Romans |
70 |
New Testament
completed |
120 +/- |
|
|
First Pope |
|
Rome officially
Christian |
325 |
Christian canon
finalized |
397 |
The
turmoil of the period during Jesus’ life and soon after his death resulted in
a great upheaval in Judahist religious thought.
There was room for a new message, and Jesus had it. Jesus must have realized that the chains
holding back the growth of the worship of Yahweh was directly related to its
roots as a regional religion.
Judahism
was based around an ancient temple in Jerusalem, at the north of Judah. True, there were vibrant Judahist
communities in other areas, including Turkey and Egypt. But its roots were regional, and the
strict practice of Mosaic Law (i.e. following the Torah) meant that the
population could not intermarry as a means to expand. Conversion was possible, but men were
required to be circumcised to convert; this hindered expansion significantly.
In
much of the rest of the Roman Empire, there was a religious vacuum at the time. The Romans were not strong advocates of
their own religion; did not insist that conquered nations convert to their
religion; and in fact had stolen most of the ideas for their religion directly
from the Greeks. (In many ways, the
emperor was considered a deity.) Being
expedient, the Romans tolerated the Judahists.
So the religion of the Roman Empire was effectively regional in nature as
well, being strong in Italy and not really being exported to the areas
subservient to Rome. In return, the
Judahists (like practitioners of religions in other conquered nations) did not
rock the boat. But the opportunity
existed for someone who could see the vacuum and come up with a better idea.
The
solution was a universal religion with a universal message: love thy neighbor. And you don’t have to be born into the
religion to be a member: the religion is in your heart. The covenant is between God and the
individual, not between God and a nation of people. What better messages for nations that had previously been at
war with each other?
Jesus
was the seed of a new religion: universality
was its message. The chains
were now released, and the events that followed Jesus’ death were to be the
catalyst for subsequent explosive growth. (That
growth would be unparalleled for another 600 years, until the arrival of another
universal religion, Islam.)
When
the Temple was destroyed in 70 CE, the Judahists lost their anchor. The Jesus sect grew rapidly, as it was
obvious that the old-line Judahist message had lost its luster. Jesus had gone up against the Judahist
establishment and lost (having been crucified), but the Christians had the last
laugh when the Temple was destroyed. Maybe
God sided with these new Christians! Judahism – as it was – essentially ceased to exist
shortly afterwards. The religion
had to evolve once again, and it did (we shall see in Chapter 13 that it became
Rabbinic Judaism). But while it was
reinventing itself, Christianity – the religion of the Jesus sect – had been
given a golden opportunity to become the premier religion of monotheists.
The Life of Jesus
There
is really no question that a person named Jesus actually lived. By the standards of historical
documentation appropriate for the time, the New Testament meets the standards
required for us to accept that Jesus was a historical figure. (This is certainly true if we accept
that Moses was an actual person, or that David was the father of Solomon, etc. After all, we know these individuals
solely through the Old Testament.) There
are many ancient historical figures that are known from a single source.
Jesus
was born in Bethlehem, a small town in Judah about 10 miles from Jerusalem. He was raised in Nazareth, a city to the
north in Galilee. He was born about
4 BCE. Some question Bethlehem as
the site of Jesus’ birth.
During
the time of Jesus, there were a number of Judahist sects. These included the Sadducees, the
Pharisees, the Essenes, and any number of other offshoots. As mentioned previously, Judahism was in a state of flux, and
there was some question as to what practices were essential to the practice of
the religion. In one such sect,
baptism was practiced. Jesus
himself fell under the influence of a Jewish priest who engaged in this
practice: John the Baptist.
Ultimately,
Jesus founded his own sect (or perhaps took over John’s after he was killed). As mentioned above, he added his own
message to the existing Judahist thought: a universal covenant. Like some others, he practiced and
preached outside the traditional priestly structure; he was an independent. Although he was very familiar with the
Old Testament, he had not been trained officially as a Jewish priest. His message struck a chord, and he
gained adherents. He was probably
what we would call a “charismatic” speaker, for he seems to have come out of
nowhere in a very short period of time. He
was able to attract attention to himself by way of his brash statements, which
questioned the orthodoxy of the priests of the Temple in Jerusalem. Others had these questions, too, but
Jesus was a powerful spokesman for the cause.
At
some point, his stature grew sufficiently that he posed a threat of some kind to
the priests. Had Jesus not taken
the next step of opposing the religious authorities directly, he might not have
been crucified. The New Testament
states Jesus claimed to be the Son of God, which was offensive to both the
priestly establishment and the Romans. This
seems contrived; perhaps he committed a specific crime of some sort, a la David
Koresh (Waco, Texas, 1993). At any
rate, the priests found a pretext to have him tried as a criminal under Roman
authority, and he was executed at the age of 37.
The Life of Paul
It
certainly appears that when Jesus was martyred, growth of the Jesus sect was not
the intended result expected by the Judahist authorities. But in the short term, they succeeded
and the followers of Jesus laid low. But
additional converts came quickly, especially in outlying areas relative to
Judah, areas where Jewish authority was diminished. One of these converts was Paul.
If
Jesus was a religious genius, then Paul was too. Where Jesus had conceived the message, Paul spread the
message. He created self-sustaining
congregations of believers, most of who were Gentiles. It was Paul who turned the repressed
Jesus sect into a new religion, Christianity.
Once
the message left Judah, it spread like wildfire. Within a short time, numerous writings appeared documenting
Jesus and the new religion. Greek
was an international language at that time, and the writings that appeared were
in Greek. This allowed them to be
passed easily from one community to another.
The budding Christian communities remained in close contact with each
other.
Within
50 years of the death of Jesus, key elements of his life had taken on a new
dimension. Two critical elements
appeared which seem to have no direct bearing on his universal message, and
which are not in keeping with the Judahist traditions: his immaculate conception
(before birth) and physical resurrection (after death). Interestingly, Paul does not mention
these. They show up first in the
Gospels, at least two generations after Jesus died.
The Church
There exists a
significant amount of information about the growth and development of the early
church.
-The golden rule
-The 11th
commandment
- God of everyone
3. Pauline
Letters
The
Pauline Letters (the Letters of Paul) were written prior to the Gospels, and we
shall review them first accordingly. This
may seem strange, as the Gospels take us into the stories of Jesus directly. It would seem that we should start with
the life of Jesus before studying what Paul wrote in his efforts to expand the
reach of Jesus. But this would be a
mistake, as the Gospels were clearly influenced by Paul’s work, if indirectly.
Paul
(born Saul) was a Greek-speaking Jew from Turkey. He converted to the Jesus sect after Jesus’ death. He was an apostle (definition??) who
helped start Christian congregations in numerous cities within the Roman Empire,
especially in Turkey and Greece. He
traveled widely, and his writings were crucial to the development of
Christianity. His special focus was
bringing Gentiles into the new religion.
Paul
spoke and wrote in Greek, the language spoken in much of the eastern portion of
the Roman Empire at that time. As
mentioned previously, all of the writings of the New Testament were originally
written in Greek. Although the
official language of the Roman Empire was Latin, many of the lands under Roman
domination had previously been under Greek domination. Since Greek had an alphabet, and the
Greeks had dominated the Mediterranean for hundreds of years, it had become a de
facto international language. In
most civilized areas outside of Greece, it was either the first or second
language of a substantial portion of the populace.
This
was especially true of Jewish settlements outside of Judah, such as where Paul
was raised. The translation of the
Old Testament into Greek had been performed about 200 BCE. This translation was the Septuagint,
which was available for those Jews who could not speak Hebrew.
Unlike
the other books of the Bible, which are considered to be anonymous, the Pauline
Letters have a known author. Most
of the Pauline Letters are actually ascribed to Paul. Taken as a group, the letters form a comprehensive body,
which describe Paul’s travels and reasonably crosscheck with extra-Biblical
sources. The letters range in time
from about 50 CE to 65 CE. These
letters, also called epistles, are the earliest surviving writings of the New
Testament. The Gospels were written
25 or more years later.
How
do we know this? Shouldn’t we
accept that the Gospels were written earlier, since they purport to describe
Jesus in an eyewitness format? The
answer is no. The Gospels were not
considered to be eyewitness reports when they were written.
Most
people today believe the Gospels are eyewitness reports because of the names of
the four Gospels, which coincide with names of four of the disciples who were
actual eyewitnesses to the story of Jesus.
But these were not the authors of those Gospels. The names were attached 50-100 years
after they were written. The actual
authors of the Gospels are unknown.
As
will be seen in the next chapter, there are a number of additional reasons to
conclude that the Gospels were written after 70 CE. On the other hand, Paul’s undated letters fit within the
time span before the destruction of the Temple (in 70 CE). So they must have preceded the Gospels.
Figure 10.1: Calendar of
dates:
Jesus crucified |
33 CE |
Paul converts |
40 |
Paul’s first
letters |
50 |
Paul dies |
63 |
Nero persecutes
Christians |
64 |
Temple destroyed |
70 |
Early
congregations had been established outside of Judah in cities in Greece
(Corinth, Thesselonia), Turkey (Ephesus, Galatia), and even Rome. Paul and others traveled from
congregation to congregation, sharing experiences, assisting as possible,
providing moral support, and helping to define the religious theory of the young
and growing cult. There was a lot
of work to do. Boundaries had to be
drawn around the ideas that would become Christianity.
For
example, did converts need to follow the Torah? Practices such as circumcision and observance of the Sabbath
were required of Judahists. After
significant debate, it was decided that the practices of the Torah were not
essential to the practice of Christianity.
This was determined at a council held in Jerusalem in 49 CE, in which a
compromise was achieved. This was a
crucial decision, because it affected the ability of the apostles (especially
Paul) to attract new converts.
Fortune
(some would call in divine intervention) smiled on Paul, and his work on behalf
of the budding religion paid off handsomely.
His impact was threefold: 1) he helped establish the Greek-speaking
branches, well outside the area of Judah; 2) his writings helped in the
recruitment of new members, especially Greek-speaking Gentiles; and 3) when the
Temple was destroyed in 70 CE, the Christian congregations outside Judah were in
a position to continue their growth, while the Jews themselves were nearly
destroyed (eliminating the competition, so to speak).
The
third point is doubly important, because to many within the religion, the
destruction of the Temple was considered to be the fulfillment of prophecy (or
at a minimum, “just desserts” for the Jews who had opposed Jesus and his
followers). Even so, the war
between the Romans and the Jews (which the Romans won) was no great boon to the
Christians. After all, there was
guilt by association, and the Jews and the Christians were associated. However, the Christians had no trouble
swallowing the destruction of the Temple, since it was a source of embarrassment
to them. Who needs a temple anyway? The Judahists would have to learn how to
get around this, but the Christians were steps ahead.
Paul’s Travels
Paul traveled extensively
within the Roman Empire.
-The importance of Paul
to Christianity
-What Paul wrote about
Jesus
Paul’s Ideas
It
is fascinating to realize that many of the ideas for which Christianity is known
today were brought forth in a very short period of time – maybe twenty years
– and that Paul brought them to us. These
ideas shaped a new religion, and are still familiar to us today. Some of these ideas are:
-
Church
-
Holy spirit
Some
of these ideas may not have been original to Paul personally. However, he is responsible – at a
minimum – for recognizing their significance, assembling the ideas into a
coherent document, and putting that document into the hands of the early
congregations.
Religious Ideas Introduced Around This Time Period
Open religion to
Gentiles |
|
Importance of
churches, congregations |
|
Original sin |
|
|
|
4. The
Gospels
There
is one overriding reason that the Gospels are dated after 70 CE: they refer to
the destruction of the Temple in one manner or another. This information could not have been
anticipated before 66 CE at the earliest (when the war between Judah and Rome
began). For example, there are
references in the Gospels seemingly predicting the fall of the Temple (Matthew
??, Mark ??, Luke ??). The only
reasonable explanation for this is that the Temple had already been destroyed.
Figure 11.1: Calendar of
dates:
Jesus crucified |
33 CE |
Temple destroyed |
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What difference does it make? (From New American
Bible)
Matthew |
|
Mark |
|
Luke |
|
What difference does it make?
|
Matthew |
Mark |
Luke |
John |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Religious Ideas Introduced Around This Time Period
Jesus as son of God
(virgin birth) |
|
Jesus physically
resurrected |
|
Importance of
substance over style |
|
Charity for the
poor |
|
5. Christian
Canon
By
100 CE, the Pauline Letters, the Gospels, and Acts had been written. But so had dozens, if not hundreds, of
other works documenting the life and teachings of Jesus and the apostles of the
early church. It was now necessary
to determine the actual lineup that would become the Bible. There was still new works being written,
and some of them were unofficial candidates for inclusion in the Bible. These include the so-called catholic, or
general letters, and Revelations, which were later determined to be canonical.
The
early congregations did not initially think of the New Testament writings as the
New Testament, a specific set of books of the Bible. For one thing, each congregation had its
own definition of which writings were considered sacred scripture.
This
left open the possibility that each congregation would develop independently,
and that the Christian messages would become distorted and diluted. Soon, representatives from the larger
congregations were debating the pros and cons of different writings, hoping to
reach a consensus as to which works were scriptural. This was a debate that would last over two hundred years
before being settled.
During
this time, the early Catholic Church came into existence.
Figure 12.1: Calendar of
dates:
Revelations written |
120 CE |
|
|
|
|
Council of Nicaea |
|
Council of Laodicea |
360 |
Synod of Carthage |
397 |
Council of
Chalcedon |
451 |
-
Religious Ideas Introduced Around This Time Period
The second coming
of Jesus |
|
Rewards in
afterlife |
|
Definition of New
Testament canon |
|
|
|
<<< Previous Section | Next section >>> |